An interesting NEJM article on the 40th anniversary of the seminal journal article on DES serves as a potent reminder of the potential effects of exposure to endocrine disruptors during critical times in development.
Beginning in the early 1960′s 1940’s, DES, a synthetic estrogen compound, was given to women in early pregnancy to prevent miscarriages. Females born from these pregnancies had an increased risk of a rare vaginal cancer during childhood, increased rates of uterine malformations that can cause infertility and premature birth, and are at a moderately higher risk for breast cancer. Use of DES in pregnant women stopped in the early 1970’s.
The lessons learned from the DES story are powerful. Endocrine disruptors may cause alterations in the reproductive tract that have severe consequences and form the basis of disease in adults decades later. Endocrine disruptors may come not only from ingested medicines, but potentially also from the environment through food. It is very difficult to recognize a teratogenic consequence of a prenatal exposure when the malformation does not manifest until 20 years later.
I’d actually never made the mental connection between DES and endocrine disruptors, and yet of course, that’s exactly how DES functioned in this case. Remarkable, how a brief drug exposure during early gestation can lead to a cancer arising over a decade later.
An important reminder, indeed, as we begin to awaken to the possible endocrine effects of chemicals such as BPA that we are using on a daily basis without really knowing how they may be affecting us in the long term.
___________________________________________________
The CDC has a very comprehensive consumer site on DES
I believe your dates are incorrect. DES was first synthesized in 1938 and then administered from 1940 – 1970. It was approved by the FDA in 1941. I am a DES daughter and one of the luckier ones, getting away with only cervical dysplasia, vaginal adenosis, a few miscarriages, two premature infants and a fused pelvic outlet. I had a cervical carcinoma in situ, a total hysterectomy for an ovarian thecoma, but seem to be doing fine. The number of DES-exposed progeny must be in the many thousands, considering the extensive use of the drug.
Thanks for the post, as it is truly pertinent to so many, many of us who inherited the mess of it.
Kindest regards.
JN
JN – You are absolutely right – the drug was FDA approved in 1938. That was supposed to read the 1940’s. I’ve corrected the typo.
Thanks for picking up the error.
The good news is that we’re so far not seeing issues as the DES cohort passes into the menopausal years (other than the above mentioned possibility of increased breast cancer risks, of course…) Glad you’re ok.
Thanks for reading.
Peggy
And oddly enough,it was my search for a recipe for Anadama bread that lead me to your blog! Very glad I found it.
~ Jeanne
In the end, it’s always about food, isn’t it?