A pregnant woman presents to an Irish hospital with ruptured membranes and cervical dilation at 17 weeks of pregnancy.
This is called an inevitable abortion.
When the mother begins to develop fever and abdominal pain, infection has set in. The treatment – antibiotics and delivery of the baby, no matter what the gestational age or viability of the fetus. Delaying delivery risks maternal sepsis and death.
There is no debate about how to manage this clinical situation. There are clear standards. Even in Ireland.
In current obstetrical practice, rare complications can arise where therapeutic intervention (including termination of a pregnancy) is required at a stage when, due to extreme immaturity of the baby, there may be little or no hope of the baby surviving. In these exceptional circumstances, it may be necessary to intervene to terminate the pregnancy to protect the life of the mother, (italics mine) while making every effort to preserve the life of the baby.
(HT to @scanman for finding these Irish regulations.)
An yet, for some unknown, god-awful reason, doctors responsible for the care of Savita Halappanavar decided that in their “Catholic” country, they were required to wait until the fetal heartbeat had stopped before terminating her non-viable, life-threatening pregnancy.
“Savita was really in agony. She was very upset, but she accepted she was losing the baby. When the consultant came on the ward rounds on Monday morning Savita asked if they could not save the baby could they induce to end the pregnancy. The consultant said, ‘As long as there is a foetal heartbeat we can’t do anything’.
“Again on Tuesday morning, the ward rounds and the same discussion. The consultant said it was the law, that this is a Catholic country. Savita [a Hindu] said: ‘I am neither Irish nor Catholic’ but they said there was nothing they could do.
“That evening she developed shakes and shivering and she was vomiting. She went to use the toilet and she collapsed. There were big alarms and a doctor took bloods and started her on antibiotics.
“The next morning I said she was so sick and asked again that they just end it, but they said they couldn’t.”
At lunchtime the foetal heart had stopped and Ms Halappanavar was brought to theatre to have the womb contents removed. “When she came out she was talking okay but she was very sick. That’s the last time I spoke to her.”
At 11 pm he got a call from the hospital. “They said they were shifting her to intensive care. Her heart and pulse were low, her temperature was high. She was sedated and critical but stable. She stayed stable on Friday but by 7pm on Saturday they said her heart, kidneys and liver weren’t functioning. She was critically ill. That night, we lost her.”
Mr Halappanavar took his wife’s body home on Thursday, November 1st, where she was cremated and laid to rest on November 3rd.
What Savita’s husband is describing is medical malpractice, pure and simple, committed by doctors practicing medicine according to the standards of the Pope rather than the profession to which they belong and the country in which they are licensed to practice.
It is tragedy and an abomination.
Were these doctors practicing out of fear and ignorance of the laws, or out of their own religious beliefs? Did they think they had no legal recourse but to ignore clear medical standards, or did they deliberately ignore them?
We will need to await the results of the investigation into this tragic case to learn the answers to these questions, but one thing is clear.
When the Pope plays doctor, women die.